TasFarmers rate election commitments from major parties

TasFarmers has handed down its verdict on how all parties contesting the state election fare regarding their agricultural policies.

The state’s peak farming body has reviewed the responses it received based on its 12 agricultural policy areas, with both major parties scored out of five for each section.

Labor scored 35 out of a possible 60, while the Liberals received 31.5 points.

TasFarmers CEO Nathan Calman said both parties barely achieved a pass mark and that their commitment to agriculture was “underwhelming and disappointing”.

"The parties had a lot of similarities overall, with the Liberal party standing out for coming back to the negotiating table on the North West Transmission Line after losing landowners' confidence,” Mr Calman said.

"Labor in comparison is committing to several core initiatives including the development of Bass Strait Island shipping strategy, our $500,000 education career coach role and a three-year commitment to our existing statewide drought role.

“But this isn’t about winning or losing.

“When both major parties scrape by with a pass, it shows agriculture isn't being taken seriously enough as a key economic driver for Tasmania.”

Mr Calman said both parties failed to deliver commitments for reforming the council rates system and wildlife and deer management.

 "We also need to see environmental benchmarking taken seriously to secure market access overseas.

“Primary producers need more than lip service.

“We're calling on all parties to close the gaps and give agriculture the commitment it deserves.”

TasFarmers also received responses from minor parties and independents.

“Shooters, Fishers and Farmers made an effort to respond, which we appreciate,” Mr Calman said.

“We also met with the Nationals, but they did not provide a formal reply.

“The Greens submitted a response, but it fell short of engaging meaningfully with our policy priorities.”

Mr Calman said that all parties should treat agriculture not as an afterthought but as the backbone of the state’s future.