Fish remains found at Verona Sands not linked to salmon mortality event
Comprehensive and independent scientific analysis has confirmed that fish remains reported at Verona Sands on Christmas Day were not linked to any salmon mortality event.
Minister for Environment, Madeleine Ogilvie, said it was the second time this summer the scientific evidence has set the record straight for Tasmanians.
“The EPA, Analytical Services Tasmania and the Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies have all independently confirmed the remains found at Verona Sands were not indicative of a farmed salmon mortality event,” Minister Ogilvie said.
“Just as testing showed the bloom observed in waters off southern Tasmania were naturally occurring Noctiluca scintillans, or sea sparkles, and not an algal bloom harmful to marine life.
“Science must come before speculation. Misinformation such as that heard from people without any level of expertise in the field, does nothing more than unnecessarily alarm the community.
“That behaviour does real harm. It undermines confidence, damages Tasmania’s brand, and places unnecessary pressure on businesses, workers and regional communities who rely on trust in our regulatory systems.”
Minister Ogilvie said these incidents also highlighted a growing and unacceptable trend of attacks on the integrity of Tasmania’s public servants, the work of educational and advisory institutions - particularly scientists.
While Tasmania’s scientists and EPA officers were working on Christmas Day and through the break to establish the facts, providing clarity, many of their loudest critics were themselves overseas or on holiday.
“That contradiction should not be lost on anyone,” the Minister said.
Minister Ogilvie said Tasmania’s environmental regulation is grounded in transparency, independence and rigorous science, and that will not change.

Add new comment
Comments
On science, salmon, reasoning and rhetoric.
Minister Ogilvie’s comment that testing shows fish found on Verona Sands beach was not linked to a mortality event, lacks crucial reasoning that would support that claim.
What testing did show, was that the remains were consistent with Atlantic Salmon.
Reports from local residents were that there were the gastrointestinal remains of at least 12 fish, and smaller pieces of fish material distributed along the beach earlier the same day.
So, what is the basis for Minister Ogilvie’s unequivocal claim that testing shows the remains were not from a salmon mortality event? It’s certainly not the claim made by the scientists who did the testing.
What actually happened then…
What actually happened then not explained in the post? Where did the fish remains come from and WHY??
Savage
What happened then? Fish remains on our beach from what??????